No equalisation levy if services, goods provided via Indian entity

Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman additionally raised the restrict on the annual contribution to provident fund accounts for tax-free curiosity to Rs 5 lakh from Rs 2.5 lakh proposed within the February 1 price range for funds the place there is no such thing as a contribution by the employer.

The Lok Sabha handed the Finance Bill 2021, which provides impact to tax proposals within the price range, on Tuesday. Replying to the controversy on the invoice within the Lok Sabha, Sitharaman clarified that the equalisation levy won’t apply if goods or providers listed on a overseas market are owned or provided by an Indian resident or Indian everlasting institution of a overseas entity.

Concerns of Extra Burden Addressed

“I intend to clarify that this equalisation levy is not applicable on consideration for goods, which are owned by Indian residents. Thus the concern raised regarding extra burden would not be there at all,” Sitharaman stated. This will be sure that earnings from such enterprise doesn’t face a further levy.

The minister stated the levy had been imposed to stage the taking part in subject between Indian companies that pay taxes domestically and overseas ecommerce corporations who do enterprise within the nation however don’t pay any earnings tax right here.

“If foreign ecommerce companies pay income tax here, then the equalisation levy is not applicable on them, hence, there is no extra burden on any company,” she stated.

Experts stated the change will profit Indian distributors who promote their goods or providers to native clients by means of overseas ecommerce operators.

PF Relief The increased restrict on provident fund contributions will largely profit authorities workers because it’s accessible in these instances the place the employer is just not making a contribution.

“Most often, it is employee contribution and employers’ contribution, but there are contributions, which are only employee and no employer contribution is made. In such cases, that amount is raised to Rs 5 lakh,” Sitharaman stated.

Private sector subscribers to the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) even have employer contributions of their retirement financial savings. Government workers contribute to the overall provident fund (GPF) with none employer contribution. Interest earned on the provident fund corpus is tax-free and no tax is levied on the time of withdrawal, making it a sexy funding possibility.

The authorities had launched the availability to tax curiosity earnings on contributions above the required restrict to plug the misuse of the profit by highincome earners who had been making giant deposits in EPF.


The authorities has provided a 10-year earnings tax vacation to the proposed state-owned growth finance establishment (DFI) and a five-year tax vacation to non-public sector ones.

Sitharaman stated the tax exemption for the National Bank for Financing Infrastructure and Development (NaBFID) was mandatory since constructing infrastructure by means of 7,000 greenfield and brownfield initiatives recognized within the National Infrastructure Pipeline was an necessary step being taken by the federal government.

She stated scheduled industrial banks can not take the danger that’s required for infrastructure funding and subsequently there was a must have a growth finance establishment.

The amendments embrace one other change had been written down worth of goodwill carried ahead from earlier years might be excluded or diminished from the written down worth of block of belongings from evaluation 12 months 2021-22 onwards.

The disallowance of depreciation on goodwill could not augur effectively for tax certainty, consultants stated.

Pranav Sayta, nationwide chief worldwide tax at EY India stated, “The disallowance of depreciation on goodwill continues to apply retroactively and denies depreciation from the current financial year 2020-21, which may not score well in terms of providing stability, predictability and certainty in the tax regime.”


Sitharaman added that the cess on petrol and diesel and the agriculture infrastructure growth cess (AIDC) had been imposed in a approach that the overall responsibility cost doesn’t go up.

She added that the precept behind levying the cess was that the actual importer of the product, on which the essential customs responsibility was levied, “will end up paying that much only or lesser but never more.”

Contributions from the cess will successfully go to the states because the infrastructure growth will occur in agriculture with the assistance of states, she stated.

On divestment, she was hopeful of attaining the FY22 goal of Rs 1.75 lakh crore even because the pandemic hit the federal government’s means to take ahead the FY21 asset-sale plan.

Source : Financial Express

error: Content is protected !!